Friday, 23 March 2007

The theology of the past

“An explicit judgment, the feeling that for better or for worse we can be ‘finished’ with this or that, always means the closing of a door that ought to remain open, the silencing of a voice that ought to continue to speak…. History writing cannot be a proclamation of judgment…. The condition for a legitimate concern with the theology of the past is rather that we should escape again from the unavoidable intoxication of the moment of our own theological recognition as quickly as possible, and with the utmost speed meet up again with our fathers, with those whose voices we think we have heard often enough before.”

—Karl Barth, Protestant Theology in the Nineteenth Century: Its Background and History (London: SCM, 1959), pp. 23-24.

1 Comment:

K. Rahner said...

First we should realize that the inalienable possession of the reality of salvation as a truth that is believed in precisely demands, in view of the historicity of man and his knowledge, a constant fresh appropriation of this reality of salvation in the form of a decision. Second we must not forget that even the modern, juridical, and actualizing interpretation of infallibility does not imply any absolutely assured knowledge of some kind of reality and truth which is quite new to us, but rather has guaranteed nothing else than that we shall abide in the ancient truth.

Post a Comment

New book

Archive

Contact

Although I'm not always able to reply to all emails, please feel free to contact me.

Faith and Theology © 2008. Template by Dicas Blogger.

TOPO