Saturday, 27 May 2006

For the love of God (5): Why I love Zwingli

A guest-post by Jim West

My initial introduction to Huldrych (sometimes Ulrich, though he preferred the former) Zwingli was many years ago now in an “Introduction to the Reformation” class I took as an undergrad. The Professor liked Luther and Calvin and gave only short shrift to Zwingli—a man whom he described as a maniac. The Prof opined that Zwingli “hated church music and took the key to the church organ of the Grossmünster and threw it into the lake.”

I wondered where he got these facts, so I started looking. Lo and behold, his story about the key and the organ turned out to be wholly apocryphal. And so, I reasoned, his opinion about Zwingli concerning music must be wrong as well—as it was. Zwingli didn’t hate church music—he was himself an accomplished musician, playing more than a dozen instruments! It was the abuse of music in the church that Zwingli despised.

So, if the Prof were wrong about these things, it seemed to me, he must also be wrong about Zwingli altogether. Zwingli was no maniac; he was the most pastoral and most conciliatory of all the great reformers, and he deserved better than he was getting at the hands of scholars who blindly loved Luther.

Thus began my life-long interest in discovering the real Zwingli. To summarize what this great man means to me in a short space is utterly impossible. I must be content with simply suggesting that, of all the magisterial reformers, he alone and singularly demonstrated that “faith without works is dead.” Luther was possessed by his own notion of “faith,” and Calvin was possessed by a desire for “works”; only Zwingli held the two together in proper tension.

Only Zwingli was a pastor. Only Zwingli was the absolute combination of scholar, theologian, and preacher. That’s why I love Zwingli. He is what I have always wished—and have failed so miserably—to be.

5 Comments:

kim fabricius said...

Thanks Jim. "Well roared", as that Calvinist dismisser of Zwingli Karl Barth might put it.

As an American who is forever trying to convince his British friends that baseball is not second-rate cricket, I appreciate your attempt to rehabilitate Zwingli as a first-rate reformer. You only use me in your last paragraph with (as it were) its sola Zwingli.

kim fabricius said...

Ooops- that last sentence should read "You only lose me . . ."

Ben Myers said...

In fact, the New Oxford Companion to Music notes not only that Zwingli "enjoyed private music-making," but also that he "was himself a composer in a modest way." Even to be a "modest" composer is quite an achievement!

Jordan said...

"Only Zwingli was a pastor"

Really? I thought Calvin fell into that category as well. Perhaps Zwingli was more holistically a pastor?

Jordan said...

"Only Zwingli was a pastor"

Really? I thought Calvin fell into that category as well. Perhaps Zwingli was more holistically a pastor?

Post a Comment

New book

Archive

Contact

Although I'm not always able to reply to all emails, please feel free to contact me.

Faith and Theology © 2008. Template by Dicas Blogger.

TOPO