tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post4804696017001005833..comments2024-03-25T13:40:30.747-04:00Comments on Faith and Theology: The faith of Jesus Christ: the pistis christou debateBen Myershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03800127501735910966noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-62359200232393662072010-05-05T15:13:24.557-04:002010-05-05T15:13:24.557-04:00To Rob,
According to my understanding: the use of...To Rob,<br /><br />According to my understanding: the use of 'en' may necessitate an objective genetive, but the absence of en ('pistis christou' or 'pistis autou') does NOT necessitate a subjective genetive. The absence of a preposition means the genetive may be interpreted in either direction.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-12186691832249683302010-02-12T00:36:47.044-05:002010-02-12T00:36:47.044-05:00I'll have to check that book out, thanks!I'll have to check that book out, thanks!Jack Palmerhttp://etherealsunshine.co.ccnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-35226953402141054632010-02-10T01:50:01.582-05:002010-02-10T01:50:01.582-05:00Do we need Barth to show up the falsity of the ...Do we need Barth to show up the falsity of the 'christological' or 'anthropological' dichotomy? Doesn't exegesis do the trick, since in cases where the 'en' preposition is used (pistis en christou) it is an objective genitive, and when the preposition is absent it's a subjective genitive? Can't we simply say "Paul uses both" and leave it at that?Robnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-6616507236253519492010-02-09T10:51:43.756-05:002010-02-09T10:51:43.756-05:00Great book; I'm reading it right now. Lots of ...Great book; I'm reading it right now. Lots of good technical Greek discussions to put me to sleep : ) I haven't gotten to yours yet, but I'm sure it will keep me awake!<br /><br />Jamesjpshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06017353888045816159noreply@blogger.com