tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post456848642017460912..comments2024-03-25T13:40:30.747-04:00Comments on Faith and Theology: Tweeting the trinity: because heresy is mehBen Myershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03800127501735910966noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-13951468898556685952017-06-17T14:49:43.970-04:002017-06-17T14:49:43.970-04:00I loved reading through these. Just discovered you...I loved reading through these. Just discovered your blog today and I'm enjoying it.<br /><br />I think #65 especially is on target. Attempts to draw direct application from the doctrine of the Trinity can cause us to project our relationships onto the transcendent God.Jason Albertsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13386712729898764163noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-30033238060096063132017-06-01T16:41:51.523-04:002017-06-01T16:41:51.523-04:00Hi Jonathan. I can see what you mean. But I don...Hi Jonathan. I can see what you mean. But I don't think I would want to say that "God is three". Basil puts it nicely in his book on the Holy Spirit. He says when it comes to the trinity we're not counting - it's not "one, two, three". Instead it's "one, one, one." Ben Myershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03800127501735910966noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-3317357403609531422017-06-01T16:35:10.537-04:002017-06-01T16:35:10.537-04:00Thanks Ben. You have three tweets that begin "...Thanks Ben. You have three tweets that begin "God is one" and none that begin "God is three." Are 38ff implicitly tweets about "God is three"? Or?? Jonathan R Wilsonnoreply@blogger.com