tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post4986807515011441714..comments2024-03-25T13:40:30.747-04:00Comments on Faith and Theology: Jesus and the immanent TrinityBen Myershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03800127501735910966noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-6655045905345085042009-04-07T22:49:00.000-04:002009-04-07T22:49:00.000-04:00Friends,Has anyone else noticed a slight shift in ...Friends,<BR/><BR/>Has anyone else noticed a slight shift in Williams reading of Hegel? From essays such as this one, to the later ones, such as “Hegel and the gods of postmodernity” and “Logic and Spirit in Hegel”?<BR/> It seems to me that he is a little more positive in these latter essays than in "Trinity and Ontology."<BR/><BR/>Peace,<BR/>ThomasThomas (Murphy) Bridgeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03390910934154428602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-47180428540969102572009-04-07T21:03:00.000-04:002009-04-07T21:03:00.000-04:00the guy could make an exile consider coming back t...the guy could make an exile consider coming back to the church...roger flyerhttp://rogerflyer.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-8152609843112879012009-04-04T09:54:00.000-04:002009-04-04T09:54:00.000-04:00Bruce,Yes. Very well put.GeorgeBruce,<BR/><BR/>Yes. Very well put.<BR/><BR/>GeorgeGeorge Hunsingernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-49170125315062271442009-04-03T18:55:00.000-04:002009-04-03T18:55:00.000-04:00Thanks for engaging here George. As I am looking f...Thanks for engaging here George. As I am looking forward to attending the upcoming conference on Trinitarian theology after Barth I find this statement helpful. It reminds me of David Bentley Hart's book.<BR/>Are you saying that the immanent Trinity is what we must assume to account for Jesus. Not that God is nothing more than this life (ie Jesus life) but that God is THE MORE without which this life would not be what it is nor could be, and within which this life is what it is?bruce hamillnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-62136864504554385042009-04-02T15:32:00.000-04:002009-04-02T15:32:00.000-04:00man I love Rowan Williams. I'm so glad he's our A...man I love Rowan Williams. I'm so glad he's our ArchbishopTony Hunthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15364659700029347895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-36671654677452892052009-04-02T14:51:00.000-04:002009-04-02T14:51:00.000-04:00Just to be clear, it is the essential and immanent...Just to be clear, it is the essential and immanent Trinity that is concrete and actual in and for itself. <BR/><BR/>It is so in the inexhaustible and golrious simplicity of the eternal divine ousia of the Holy Trinity.<BR/><BR/>It is this divine reality that makes Jesus's death and resurrection possible and intelligible. Not the reverse.George Hunsingernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-66839683473271957002009-04-02T14:46:00.000-04:002009-04-02T14:46:00.000-04:00possible and intelligibleYes, not concrete and act...<I>possible and intelligible</I><BR/><BR/>Yes, not concrete and actual.<BR/><BR/>On divine simplicity as related to the inexhaustible depth and beauty of the eternal divine being, see Rowan Williams, Arius: Heresy and Tradition, pp. 119-26.George Hunsingernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-81268127736574193022009-04-02T11:54:00.000-04:002009-04-02T11:54:00.000-04:00Yes, yes, and yes.Yes, yes, and yes.R.O. Flyerhttp://rainandtherhinoceros.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-77900198007925467502009-04-02T10:24:00.000-04:002009-04-02T10:24:00.000-04:00The essay is reprinted in Rowan Williams, On Chris...The essay is reprinted in Rowan Williams, <I>On Christian Theology</I> (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), pp. 148-66.kim fabriciusnoreply@blogger.com