tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post116304513472253917..comments2024-03-25T13:40:30.747-04:00Comments on Faith and Theology: Paul DeHart's research in progressBen Myershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03800127501735910966noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-1163127182619742332006-11-09T21:53:00.000-05:002006-11-09T21:53:00.000-05:00Yes, Kim -- I think that's exactly what DeHart is ...Yes, Kim -- I think that's <I>exactly</I> what DeHart is trying to do!Ben Myershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03800127501735910966noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-1163076464881310782006-11-09T07:47:00.000-05:002006-11-09T07:47:00.000-05:00Tantalising!"How do we get from the first two to t...Tantalising!<BR/><BR/><I>"How do we get from the first two to the last?"</I> More importantly, I hope DeHart explains how we get from the last back to the first two!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14261952.post-1163047022393041602006-11-08T23:37:00.000-05:002006-11-08T23:37:00.000-05:00DeHart is presenting on Schleiermacher and the Tri...DeHart is presenting on Schleiermacher and the Trinity on Sunday Morning the 19th at 9am at AAR. Here is an abstract <BR/><BR/>Schleiermacher’s Trinity: Redemption as Divine Presence<BR/>Paul DeHart, Vanderbilt University<BR/><BR/>This presentation will show how the idea of God’s union with human nature is the mediating conceptuality needed to understand Schleiermacher’s claim that the essence of the doctrine of the Trinity coincides with the essence of his characteristic understanding of redemption. First his notion of the only possible way to understand “divine presence in a creature” will be sketched. Then this notion will be used to clarify the basic moves of his discussion of the trinity: its soteriological orientation, its modalist critique of the “ecclesiastical doctrine”, and its stern refusal of any speculative grounding for that traditional doctrine’s reconstruction.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com